RADT-23. MODALITY-SPECIFIC CNS INJURY FOLLOWING PROTON VS PHOTON BEAM RADIOTHERAPY IN GLIOMA
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract BACKGROUND CNS injury following brain-directed radiotherapy (RT) is common and may mimic disease progression. Dosimetric advantages of protons (PRT) over photons (XRT) minimize radiation to healthy brain, potentially limiting radiotoxic sequelae. We characterized radiotoxicity i.e., radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy (RIL), brain tissue necrosis (TN), cerebral microbleeds (CMB), during progression-free survival (PFS) periods in glioma patients irradiated with PRT or XRT. METHODS 34 (19 male; mean age = 40.10y) grade 2/3 gliomas treated by partial cranial RT were stratified modality [XRT(n 17) vs PRT(n 17)] matched on 11 criteria [age, sex, tumor type/location/laterality, mutational status (IDH; 1p19q deletion), concurrent/adjuvant chemotherapy, dose/fractions] for retrospective analysis. Radiotoxicity was longitudinally until 3 years post-RT via analysis serial MRI T2/FLAIR- T1+Contrast- Susceptibility (CMB)-weighted sequences. RIL rated using a novel scoring system embedded Fazekas scale (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9), at global (whole-brain) hemispheric levels. RESULTS Analysis delayed identified significant modality-specific differences. While both groups developed moderate-to-severe [62% 72% (PRT)], XRT resulted greater dynamics (i.e., average % change between 1 post-RT) the contralesional hemisphere [F(1, 31) 4.32, p < .05]. Conversely, associated higher TN incidence [6%(XRT) 18%(PRT) z - 2.22, 0.03, two-tailed]. Finally, while CMB [76%(XRT) 71%(PRT)] burden [mean #CMB: 4.3(XRT) 4.2(PRT)] comparable, lesion-to-radiation field (RF)-correlation preferential clustering RF margins [X2(2, N =200)= 8.8, .02]. CONCLUSIONS progressive patients. Injury patterns suggest specificity as RIL, TN, exhibit unique spatiotemporal differences PRT, likely reflecting dosimetric biological photons. The impact such sequelae cognition subject current investigation.
منابع مشابه
Proton beam radiotherapy of iris melanoma.
PURPOSE To report on outcomes after proton beam radiotherapy of iris melanoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1993 and 2004, 88 patients with iris melanoma received proton beam radiotherapy, with 53.1 Gy in 4 fractions. RESULTS The patients had a mean age of 52 years and a median follow-up of 2.7 years. The tumors had a median diameter of 4.3 mm, involving more than 2 clock hours of iris in ...
متن کاملAssessment of Neutron Contamination Originating from the Presence of Wedge and Block in Photon Beam Radiotherapy
Background: One of the main causes of induction of secondary cancer in radiation therapy is neutron contamination received by patients during treatment.Objective: In the present study the impact of wedge and block on neutron contamination production is investigated. The evaluations are conducted for a 15 MV Siemens Primus linear accelerator. Methods: Simulations were performed using MCNPX Monte...
متن کاملIn vivo dosimetry of intraoral stent using TLD during external photon beam radiotherapy of oral cavity
Introduction: Individual oral stent is a mouth-opening device that used in head and neck cancer radiotherapy with the intention of decreasing radiation dose to health tissues. The aim of this study was to check the dose delivered to both the hard palate and tongue when patient uses the stent during radiotherapy of tongue carcinoma. Methods and materials<stron...
متن کاملProton-Beam vs Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
June 01, 2008 External-beam radiation is a highly effective curative treatment option for men with localized prostate cancer.[1,2] Over the past several decades, efforts have been made to improve the “therapeutic ratio” of radiation by increasing dose to improve cure rates without causing a substantial increase in side effects. Due to its potential to create superior dose distributions, proton ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Neuro-oncology
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1523-5866', '1522-8517']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac209.213